Skip to content

About PERC

All Areas of Focus

All Research

The Double Standard of Environmental Enforcement

One of the hypocrisies of modern environmental law is its double standard of enforcement: strict application to small entrepreneurs, and exemptions for politically powerful players like large industry and municipalities. This pattern can be seen in Canada as well as the United States. Kerry Freek, editor of Water Canada magazine, tells the story of oneContinue reading “The Double Standard of Environmental Enforcement”

The Principle of Non-Regression: Environmental Laws That Can’t Be Repealed

Jim Huffman, a long-time friend of PERC, recently published an op-ed in the European edition of the WSJ entitled, “The EU’s ‘Non-Regression’ Gambit.” In it he says, On Sept. 29, European parliamentarians adopted a resolution calling for next June’s United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro to demand that all nations adhereContinue reading “The Principle of Non-Regression: Environmental Laws That Can’t Be Repealed”

Economic Prosperity for North American Indians

The link between natural resources, institutions, and economic prosperity is nowhere more apparent than on American Indian reservations. For this reason, PERC hosted a workshop at Lewis and Clark College on “Institutions, Resource Use, and Economic Prosperity for North American Indians.” If the scholarly papers presented at the workshop didn’t provide enough evidence of thisContinue reading “Economic Prosperity for North American Indians”

Justice Stevens Defends Kelo

The WSJ’s Jess Bravin reports on an interview with recently retired Justice John Paul Stevens in which he defended his “most unpopular opinion” — Kelo v. New London — from recent criticism by Justice Antonin Scalia (see here and here). “It’s the most unpopular opinion I ever wrote, no doubt about it,” Justice Stevens said in an interview. He said he empathized withContinue reading “Justice Stevens Defends Kelo”

The Keystone Pipeline Precedent

Others have commented on President Obama’s decision to punt on the Keystone XL pipeline project.  Ordering additional review pushes the decision past the next election and enables the Administration to evade responsibility should the project ultimately fail.  As those who study environmental law know, delays of this sort are often enough to derail major projects for goodContinue reading “The Keystone Pipeline Precedent”